<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MeCCSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meccsa.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meccsa.org.uk</link>
	<description>Media, Communication and Cultural Studies Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MeCCSA Conference 2011 by Me, myself and 23andMe &#8211; article in Digicult &#124; Biodigital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.meccsa.org.uk/events/2011_conference_overview/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Me, myself and 23andMe &#8211; article in Digicult &#124; Biodigital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meccsa.stowaway.net/2010/01/2011_conference_overview/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] met Nicola Bozzi at the MeCCSA conference in Salford this year and we had a chat about online cultures of genomics &#8211; he wrote an article for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] met Nicola Bozzi at the MeCCSA conference in Salford this year and we had a chat about online cultures of genomics &#8211; he wrote an article for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Remembering Stuart Hood by David Hutchison</title>
		<link>http://www.meccsa.org.uk/news/remembering-stuart-hood/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hutchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meccsa.org.uk/?p=1387#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I first met Stuart Hood in the 1970s at one of the broadcasting symposiums mounted by Manchester University’s adult education department. These events brought together practitioners from the BBC and non-BBC organisations and were at that time reckoned to be one of the very few forums when they could meet for open and free-ranging discussion. A few academics also attended. By then Stuart Hood had been a very successful broadcasting  executive and  freelance programme maker and was now an academic –‘I’m not a real professor’ he was fond of saying in disarming fashion. He most certainly was an individual possessed of a steely intelligence, whose interventions in debate were few but considered, and always to be listened to with care, not least because of the crisp manner of delivery in what used to be called an educated Scottish accent, in which those more skilled in these matters than I am could no doubt detect traces of his native Angus.

When at the beginning of the 1980s what is now Glasgow Caledonian University decided to develop a media studies degree, we approached Stuart and asked him to join an internal scrutiny panel prior to a CNAA submission. This he willingly undertook and, subsequent to the degree’s approval, he became our chief examiner for a number of years.  He was always measured and generous in his comments and we were very grateful for his contribution. And for the opportunity over lunch to talk about much more than mark ranges and dissertation topics.  I am writing this on a train which is hugging the coast en route to Aberdeen and I remember asking him over one such lunch why latterly he had moved away from London to Brighton. ‘To be near the sea again,’ was the reply.

Stuart Hood was a remarkably accomplished individual who distinguished himself not only in his chosen field but also as a translator and a novelist. The first book of his I read was enthusiastically recommended to me by my then colleague, James Boyle, who himself later worked for the BBC. That book was not one of the novels, which came later, but ‘Pebbles from my Skull’ (later re-issued as ‘Carlino’), his account of his life behind enemy lines with the Italian partisans at the end of the Second World War. It is an exciting story in which the author comes close to death on several occasions. It is also an intermittent meditation on the differences between the Presbyterian milieu in which Stuart Hood grew up and the much warmer, much more overtly emotional, Italian one he found himself in at this time.

As Brian Winston points out, fighting alongside the partisans inevitably meant some involvement – however peripheral - in dealing with suspected spies and traitors, and the feelings of regret, even guilt, which followed. A colleague remarked to me on hearing of Stuart’s death that one always knew when talking to him that this was a man with a military background. 

His politics were very much of the left, though personally I have some difficulty in believing, notwithstanding what Brian Winston says, that such a hard headed individual would have had much to do with an outfit quite as dotty as the Workers’ Revolutionary Party.

It was both a pleasure and a privilege to have known him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first met Stuart Hood in the 1970s at one of the broadcasting symposiums mounted by Manchester University’s adult education department. These events brought together practitioners from the BBC and non-BBC organisations and were at that time reckoned to be one of the very few forums when they could meet for open and free-ranging discussion. A few academics also attended. By then Stuart Hood had been a very successful broadcasting  executive and  freelance programme maker and was now an academic –‘I’m not a real professor’ he was fond of saying in disarming fashion. He most certainly was an individual possessed of a steely intelligence, whose interventions in debate were few but considered, and always to be listened to with care, not least because of the crisp manner of delivery in what used to be called an educated Scottish accent, in which those more skilled in these matters than I am could no doubt detect traces of his native Angus.</p>
<p>When at the beginning of the 1980s what is now Glasgow Caledonian University decided to develop a media studies degree, we approached Stuart and asked him to join an internal scrutiny panel prior to a CNAA submission. This he willingly undertook and, subsequent to the degree’s approval, he became our chief examiner for a number of years.  He was always measured and generous in his comments and we were very grateful for his contribution. And for the opportunity over lunch to talk about much more than mark ranges and dissertation topics.  I am writing this on a train which is hugging the coast en route to Aberdeen and I remember asking him over one such lunch why latterly he had moved away from London to Brighton. ‘To be near the sea again,’ was the reply.</p>
<p>Stuart Hood was a remarkably accomplished individual who distinguished himself not only in his chosen field but also as a translator and a novelist. The first book of his I read was enthusiastically recommended to me by my then colleague, James Boyle, who himself later worked for the BBC. That book was not one of the novels, which came later, but ‘Pebbles from my Skull’ (later re-issued as ‘Carlino’), his account of his life behind enemy lines with the Italian partisans at the end of the Second World War. It is an exciting story in which the author comes close to death on several occasions. It is also an intermittent meditation on the differences between the Presbyterian milieu in which Stuart Hood grew up and the much warmer, much more overtly emotional, Italian one he found himself in at this time.</p>
<p>As Brian Winston points out, fighting alongside the partisans inevitably meant some involvement – however peripheral &#8211; in dealing with suspected spies and traitors, and the feelings of regret, even guilt, which followed. A colleague remarked to me on hearing of Stuart’s death that one always knew when talking to him that this was a man with a military background. </p>
<p>His politics were very much of the left, though personally I have some difficulty in believing, notwithstanding what Brian Winston says, that such a hard headed individual would have had much to do with an outfit quite as dotty as the Workers’ Revolutionary Party.</p>
<p>It was both a pleasure and a privilege to have known him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Remembering Stuart Hood by Murray Weston</title>
		<link>http://www.meccsa.org.uk/news/remembering-stuart-hood/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meccsa.org.uk/?p=1387#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Like Peter Lewis, I also feel a sense of guilt in not hearing of Stuart Hood&#039;s death before now because he was somewhat of a hero.

I had brief dealings with Stuart in the course of the production of a film entitled FASCISM, that was made in 1980 under the auspices of the InterUniversity History Film Consortium.  This was a collaboration between three Professors - Antony Polonsky (then at LSE*), Stuart Hood and the late James Joll (LSE).  James read the voice-over, and Stuart looked after the structure of the film with Antony who delivered much of the writing - but it was a true collaboration throughout its construction.  

When the film was in the research phase, I remember taking Stuart and Antony to the roof of 81 Dean Street (in the old BFI building where the BUFVC was at that time) with a pile of viewing prints to a former film storage vault where there was a 35 mm viewing table.  I was fairly surprised, as a young whippersnapper, when the great Stuart Hood called down 20 minutes later to say he had never laced up a viewing table before and would I go back up to get him out of trouble...

The completed film was very well received by its target university audience and it probably deserved wider distribution.  It drew on content sourced from British, Italian and German archives and I am pleased to say that it can be viewed online at http://bufvc.ac.uk/filmandsound?film_name=polonsky_f_hs6  (this delivery, for rights reasons, is offered under authenticated access only for bona fide staff and students in UK higher and further education).  Along with the film there is a downloadable PDF of the accompanying booklet which, when it was first released, attracted considerable interest in its own right.

It is probably worth mentioning, as an historical factet, that the film FASCISM, along with Stanley Milgram&#039;s OBEDIENCE, were used by Howard Davies, Alan Howard and the cast from the RSC as they planned the first production of C P Taylor&#039;s play GOOD that was staged at the Donmar Warehouse to huge acclaim in 1981 (and later went to New York in 1982).

*Professor Antony Polonsky is at Brandeis University (http://tinyurl.com/yyegvxw)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Peter Lewis, I also feel a sense of guilt in not hearing of Stuart Hood&#8217;s death before now because he was somewhat of a hero.</p>
<p>I had brief dealings with Stuart in the course of the production of a film entitled FASCISM, that was made in 1980 under the auspices of the InterUniversity History Film Consortium.  This was a collaboration between three Professors &#8211; Antony Polonsky (then at LSE*), Stuart Hood and the late James Joll (LSE).  James read the voice-over, and Stuart looked after the structure of the film with Antony who delivered much of the writing &#8211; but it was a true collaboration throughout its construction.  </p>
<p>When the film was in the research phase, I remember taking Stuart and Antony to the roof of 81 Dean Street (in the old BFI building where the BUFVC was at that time) with a pile of viewing prints to a former film storage vault where there was a 35 mm viewing table.  I was fairly surprised, as a young whippersnapper, when the great Stuart Hood called down 20 minutes later to say he had never laced up a viewing table before and would I go back up to get him out of trouble&#8230;</p>
<p>The completed film was very well received by its target university audience and it probably deserved wider distribution.  It drew on content sourced from British, Italian and German archives and I am pleased to say that it can be viewed online at <a href="http://bufvc.ac.uk/filmandsound?film_name=polonsky_f_hs6" rel="nofollow">http://bufvc.ac.uk/filmandsound?film_name=polonsky_f_hs6</a>  (this delivery, for rights reasons, is offered under authenticated access only for bona fide staff and students in UK higher and further education).  Along with the film there is a downloadable PDF of the accompanying booklet which, when it was first released, attracted considerable interest in its own right.</p>
<p>It is probably worth mentioning, as an historical factet, that the film FASCISM, along with Stanley Milgram&#8217;s OBEDIENCE, were used by Howard Davies, Alan Howard and the cast from the RSC as they planned the first production of C P Taylor&#8217;s play GOOD that was staged at the Donmar Warehouse to huge acclaim in 1981 (and later went to New York in 1982).</p>
<p>*Professor Antony Polonsky is at Brandeis University (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/yyegvxw" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yyegvxw</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three-D Issue 17: Inside out: turning consumers back into students by Rosalind Hanmer</title>
		<link>http://www.meccsa.org.uk/news/three-d-issue-17-inside-out-turning-consumers-back-into-students/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind Hanmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meccsa.org.uk/?p=1272#comment-158</guid>
		<description>During my twenty years experience of Further and Higher Education I have understood the ethos of &#039;widening participation&#039; on a profound level. My major encounter with this concept was in the mission of London Metropolitan University formally North London University and before this North London Polytechnic. The mission of these educational establishments came to hold for me a place in my heart because their prime objective of education was the student experience and the unlocking of the true potential of every student with the aim to achieve diversity in student population and to enable students to have a voice in the decision-making within their learning environment. If will allow the ethos of &#039;widening participate&#039; to be lost the youth of this country will have no future.This governments aim is to dissolve and destroy our world wide renowned education system. It is their objective to break down the building blocks of education by removing the funding available, by setting extortionate fees for students thus eroding the assurance that everyone has equal access to a lifetime of high quality education and thus enabling and maintaining a stable and fulfilled society. Access to education and its relevance to individuals should not be class-based or profit driven. The White Paper title &#039;Students at the Heart of the System&#039; is ironic in its naming, given that students are now referred to as customers within the business speak adopted by higher educational managers.  The proposals in this white paper disrupt and undermine our global standing as world class in our delivery of higher education. These profit driven proposals will drive down quality as the focus of our educational system. The massive debts students will be saddled with as being pointed out by many unions is contradictory in that the governments supposed thinking in cutting public funding is to pay off the national debt, yet at the same time happily transferring debt to students and encouraging them to borrow more is the hypocrisy and foundation of this governments policies. Their stance is another ideological attack to destroy the working class and the most vulnerable people within our society taking away their self esteem and true potential as citizens of this country. We must fight back and become the mosquito in the ear of this government, we must continue to strengthen our resolve by becoming new super heroes, we need to call on our unions and universities to polish their shields of social justice and form our ranks under the banner of &#039;Captain Relentless&#039; by refusing as Milly Williamson suggests to use or accept the language of &#039;consumer choice&#039; that is cloaked in its vagueness and concealment of the truth. We are being attacked on all fronts such as education, and the National Health Service, not forgetting the erosion of our protective health and safety rules and our hard earned terms and conditions of employment. All these things traditional fought for and successfully achieved over the decades. In defending education for all we must remember that the youth of this country are our future and our responsibility, so please keep having dialogue with friends and family and explain the real issues. It is a right for everyone to have a decent education not just a privilege for the few. Lets take back the shield that belongs to the people and not to governments who continue to capitulate to the regime of Thatcher free-market policies. lets rise again to defend our education system that encourages our youth to grow and develop without limitation. Lets use the educational philosophy  that bases its ideas and teachings on the highest seat of learning, a cradle of a new culture founded on widening participation not driven for profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During my twenty years experience of Further and Higher Education I have understood the ethos of &#8216;widening participation&#8217; on a profound level. My major encounter with this concept was in the mission of London Metropolitan University formally North London University and before this North London Polytechnic. The mission of these educational establishments came to hold for me a place in my heart because their prime objective of education was the student experience and the unlocking of the true potential of every student with the aim to achieve diversity in student population and to enable students to have a voice in the decision-making within their learning environment. If will allow the ethos of &#8216;widening participate&#8217; to be lost the youth of this country will have no future.This governments aim is to dissolve and destroy our world wide renowned education system. It is their objective to break down the building blocks of education by removing the funding available, by setting extortionate fees for students thus eroding the assurance that everyone has equal access to a lifetime of high quality education and thus enabling and maintaining a stable and fulfilled society. Access to education and its relevance to individuals should not be class-based or profit driven. The White Paper title &#8216;Students at the Heart of the System&#8217; is ironic in its naming, given that students are now referred to as customers within the business speak adopted by higher educational managers.  The proposals in this white paper disrupt and undermine our global standing as world class in our delivery of higher education. These profit driven proposals will drive down quality as the focus of our educational system. The massive debts students will be saddled with as being pointed out by many unions is contradictory in that the governments supposed thinking in cutting public funding is to pay off the national debt, yet at the same time happily transferring debt to students and encouraging them to borrow more is the hypocrisy and foundation of this governments policies. Their stance is another ideological attack to destroy the working class and the most vulnerable people within our society taking away their self esteem and true potential as citizens of this country. We must fight back and become the mosquito in the ear of this government, we must continue to strengthen our resolve by becoming new super heroes, we need to call on our unions and universities to polish their shields of social justice and form our ranks under the banner of &#8216;Captain Relentless&#8217; by refusing as Milly Williamson suggests to use or accept the language of &#8216;consumer choice&#8217; that is cloaked in its vagueness and concealment of the truth. We are being attacked on all fronts such as education, and the National Health Service, not forgetting the erosion of our protective health and safety rules and our hard earned terms and conditions of employment. All these things traditional fought for and successfully achieved over the decades. In defending education for all we must remember that the youth of this country are our future and our responsibility, so please keep having dialogue with friends and family and explain the real issues. It is a right for everyone to have a decent education not just a privilege for the few. Lets take back the shield that belongs to the people and not to governments who continue to capitulate to the regime of Thatcher free-market policies. lets rise again to defend our education system that encourages our youth to grow and develop without limitation. Lets use the educational philosophy  that bases its ideas and teachings on the highest seat of learning, a cradle of a new culture founded on widening participation not driven for profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media and Mothers’ Matters by Write up from &#8216;Media and Mothers&#8217; Matters&#8217; conference, Winchester Uni &#171; Tamsyn Dent</title>
		<link>http://www.meccsa.org.uk/events/media-and-mothers%e2%80%99-matters/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Write up from &#8216;Media and Mothers&#8217; Matters&#8217; conference, Winchester Uni &#171; Tamsyn Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meccsa.org.uk/new-site/?p=1169#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday I attended a half day conference ‘Media and Mother’s matters’ hosted by Dr Oluyinka Esan at Winchester University. I have to admit, I was a bit grudging about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday I attended a half day conference ‘Media and Mother’s matters’ hosted by Dr Oluyinka Esan at Winchester University. I have to admit, I was a bit grudging about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.803 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-22 17:08:50 -->

